Going Way Out on a Limb
Matthew Yglesias has a sterling suggestion: Progressive candidates should start promoting progressive positions. Here's a short list of possible talking points he came up with.
It's remarkable the extent to which you almost never see leading Democrats articulate commonplace notions like "starting a war with Iran would be a strategic disaster for the United States," "expending finite resources investigating people who there's no probable cause to suspect is probably a waste of time," "we should focus on fighting al-Qaeda rather than other Muslims who haven't attacked us," "invading Iraq was a huge mistake," "Harry Truman and Franklin Roosevelt founded the UN because a strong UN is good for America," "getting other countries to follow non-proliferation agreements is going to require us to follow them too," or "reviving the Israeli-Arab peace process would make it easier for us to find Muslim allies." Now I'm not going to promise anyone that those exact phrases are ones it would be smart to use. But the ideas are important ones, and the real political professionals need to think about finding the best ways to express them.
I must be much farther over to the left than I ever realized. Not one of those suggestions seems overtly progressive to me. They just seem to be common sense. Simple common sense.
1 Comments:
I agree--they seem like solid positions to which there are no strong counterarguments. And when I read them, it struck me as strange that so few (minus a Kucinich here or there) are pushing them.
Post a Comment
<< Home