Talk Talk Talk Talk Talk Myself to Death: Hitting the Links

Monday, September 12, 2005

Hitting the Links

Here are a couple of things worth reading from the last couple of days.

At Hullabaloo, Digby spells out an argument about how the failed federal response to Katrina was not based in class but in race:

There are strong forces at work that rival economics in people's minds --- tribalism, religion, culture, and tradition all have strong pulls on the human psyche. We are complicated creatures. And the complicated creatures who call ourselves Americans have an issue with race. It's been there from the beginning of this republic and it affects our political system in profound ways.

In the modern era, the Republicans party has developed a patented technique for exploiting it. It's been in disuse for the last few years --- war superseded their need for it. But, they only have to pull it out of the package, wipe off the filth from the last time they used it and put it back in action.

. . .

These last two weeks I've heard the old school racists dragging out the "n" word, but they are dying out. We aren't going to see a lot of that anymore, thank god. But the code words were being slung around more freely than I've seen in ages. The first thing I heard out of people's mouths was that these people [trapped in New Orleans] had been "irresponsible" for not following the directions they were given. The next thing I heard was that "looters" were taking over the city and they should be shot. Then there was the "why do they have so many kids" and "why can't they clean up after themselves" and "defecating where they stood."

I've heard all of this before. Just as racist code language sounds sweet and familiar to the true believers, it sets off alarm bells for people like me; when you grow up in a racist household, (just as when you grow up in a black household, I would assume) you know it when you hear it.

The argument over whether this is an issue of class or race is in some ways a false one. Although it's not accurate or fair to tie race to class, I think that's what happens a majority of the time. Many people claim to be talking about class when they really mean race. When we hear a discussion about the poor of New Orleans, we don't immediately assume we're talking about the white poor, or even the poor of indeterminate race. We assume we're talking about the black poor. We need to watch out for evidence that the Repubs are falling back on their old Southern strategy and call it out when we see it.

Dan Froomkin, in a column entitled "Now They Tell Us," runs down various stories over the weekend that pointed out Bush's nonexistent wardrobe:

Amid a slew of stories this weekend about the embattled presidency and the blundering government response to the drowning of New Orleans, some journalists who are long-time observers of the White House are suddenly sharing scathing observations about President Bush that may be new to many of their readers.

Is Bush the commanding, decisive, jovial president you've been hearing about for years in so much of the mainstream press?

Maybe not so much.

Judging from the blistering analyses in Time, Newsweek, and elsewhere these past few days, it turns out that Bush is in fact fidgety, cold and snappish in private. He yells at those who dare give him bad news and is therefore not surprisingly surrounded by an echo chamber of terrified sycophants. He is slow to comprehend concepts that don't emerge from his gut. He is uncomprehending of the speeches that he is given to read. And oh yes, one of his most significant legacies -- the immense post-Sept. 11 reorganization of the federal government which created the Homeland Security Department -- has failed a big test.

Maybe it's Bush's sinking poll numbers -- he is, after all, undeniably an unpopular president now. Maybe it's the way that the federal response to the flood has cut so deeply against Bush's most compelling claim to greatness: His resoluteness when it comes to protecting Americans.

But for whatever reason, critical observations and insights that for so long have been zealously guarded by mainstream journalists, and only doled out in teaspoons if at all, now seem to be flooding into the public sphere.

An emperor-has-no-clothes moment seems upon us.

We talked about the Newsweek article yesterday, but that was not the only such article by far. Check out Froomkin to see what else some of the major print outlets had to say about the Bush Administration's current location on the political landscape.

4 Comments:

At 9:56 PM, September 13, 2005, Blogger Kevin D. Korenthal said...

This is =crap. I tear Froomkin's lies apart here. Unhappy With Reality, The MSM Gives Bush A New Image.

 
At 11:22 PM, September 13, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You "tear Froomkin's lies apart" by calling them lies and then, in case we haven't gotten your argument, calling them lies again. Nice try, but I'd recommend a spell check next time.

 
At 11:35 PM, September 13, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I followed the link that Techunter included above, and all I can say is "Yikes." This guy is running away from reality on a dead sprint. There's a whole lot he is determined to not learn and based on his writing, I predict success for him. His head is, at best, in the sand.

 
At 9:36 PM, September 15, 2005, Blogger Vergasy said...

Techunter is a total fraud and liar. I went back and forth with him a few times, with interesting results--check it out here and here.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home